11.18.2007

Was I right at first?

John's points_
-I don't know if your architectonic-coral processes are best utilized here, in these such places, to stabilize and control, to meet rising water with rising boundary conditions? Or maybe this is just a slightly updated version of the old Holland/dikes scenario? And, really, these are not problem-solving solutions to the bigger global issues-

-A coral-based construct would be an incisively new approach with somewhat more longterm results.

-the water/notion hasn't yet gelled into a compelling strategy or a specific challenge. I do wonder if you are working just too hard to conceptualize a truly amazing, provocative set of drop-dead intentions...without a firm idea behind it.

in response to john's comment_

this is also the problem that i'm having as i try to apply strategies to these sites i realize that it is only a somewhat more longterm fix, in the end i'm proposing no solution to the root of the problems and i've strayed away from my original ideas about tectonics and making. systems thinking can be applied to the way cities react to a new environment but this involves urban planning, transportation and infrastructure much more so than architecture...

the oilplatform is a way of addressing these changes in a strictly architectural manner as an example or realisation of what architecture can be in a world where water is exerting its presence. At the same time the oilplatform IS the problem, a monument to the greedy selfish escalade driving oil tycoons that caused global warming and made water so unavoidable in the UK, Bangladesh and New Orleans... An architectural system attached to this monument of self-destruction transforms it into, dare i say, a "monument to sustainability." suggesting a direction for architecture which is adaptable and integrated with natural systems rather than opposed to them, and that in conjunction with systematic planning IS a long term fix and not simply a LEED Platinum one.

2 comments:

Andrew H. said...

nate,

i think you need to re-read john's comments, i think his use of the word "coral" is him talking about our collective nickname for you systematic architecture.
what i would read out of that is a concern about nailing down and following this process and not following the desire for the sexy super problem that we are going to fix to have a kicka** thesis.

we'll tlak more tomorrow night - but i think what you need to focus on is following the process. The rest of what we're throwing your way are resources to lend legitimacy to that process - not to distract you from it.

in some aspects i do think your gut instincts have been right but there needs to be a system of reasoning backing it all up. the site scenarios are what will help answer quesitons about which direction to head next, and where this architectural system is to be applied, we'll tlak more on this tomorrow.

Andrew H. said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.